Recent scientific research confirms that gardening may be linked to higher rates of vegetable eating in older populations of adults. According to a recent report from Texas A&M University and Texas State University, older populations of adults who garden are more likely to eat vegetables than their non-gardening counterparts.
This study, published in Hort Technology, surveyed adults over the age of 50. Over 250 questionnaires were completed by adults ages 50 and older, over the course of one month. The online survey was created as an effort to encourage gardening among older adults, and was part of a program involving what the researchers called “gardening intervention.”
These gardening intervention programs were created as an outreach effort based on other research studies that showed the clear link between poor nutrition and early mortality and morbidity in the elderly. In fact, poor nutrition has been shown to contribute to death rates just as much as cigarette smoking. And even though older populations report eating more fruit and vegetables than other age groups studied, the research shows that more than half of the U.S. elderly population does not get even the five fruit-and-veggie daily governmental recommendation. I would even go as far to recommend getting even more than five servings of fruit and vegetables on a daily basis.
Previous Research on Gardening & Nutrition
Previous research confirmed similar results, showing that when people are connected to the earth, through gardening, they are more likely to eat more of the fruits and vegetables they are tending. It makes good sense. When we tend to something and watch it grow for weeks, we are more likely to eat it!
The study from Texas A&M and Texas State also looked into the fruit and vegetable eating patterns of people who tended to gardens, and those who did not. The study also considered some of the differences in fruit and vegetable consumption in elderly people who had been gardening for long periods of time, as well as those who were totally new to gardening. And while there was a clear link between gardeners and vegetable intake, the same did not hold true for fruit consumption, stated the authors of the study.
Tina Waliczek Cade, Researcher & Author of the Study: “Our results support previous studies that indicated gardeners were more likely to consume vegetables when compared with non-gardeners. Interestingly, these results were not found with regard to fruit consumption… Gardening intervention programs late in life would be an effective method of boosting vegetable and fruit consumption in older adults.”
What’s more, it was found that it didn’t matter how long the people had been gardening. Whether a long-term or short-term gardeners, there was no relationship between time spent gardening and the number of vegetables and fruits eaten. This may mean that people who start gardening later in life can still be dramatically affected by the act of gardening. The study also stated that the number of hours per week that the participants spent gardening did not seem to be a major factor effecting the number of vegetables and fruits eaten.
In other words, we can start, at any time in our lives, to connect to the earth, the soil and the food we eat. It may also mean that the simple act of gardening, may cause us to eat better foods, and to consequently live longer lives. It also means that we need not have large amounts of time to dedicate to the task. Any amount of gardening was found to have a positive outcome on fruit and veggie consumption.
What are your thoughts on this new research? Will this encourage you to start gardening? Let me hear it in the comments below.
- Aime J. Sommerfeld, Amy L. McFarland, Tina M. Waliczek, Jayne M. Zajicek1. Growing Minds: evaluating the relationship between gardening and fruit and vegetable consumption in older adults. HortTechnology. 2010 August. vol. 20 no. 4 711-717.
- McAleese, J.D., Rankin, L.L. Garden-based nutrition education affects fruit and vegetable consumption in sixth-grade adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Apr;107(4):662-5.