On February 19, 2020, a group of virologists published authoritatively in the Lancet, reassuring the world that covid-19 was a pandemic from nature, caused by a wild strain of coronavirus. The group also demanded that the governments and scientists of the world begin to work with the Chinese. “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” they wrote. Scientists “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.”
But there’s nothing natural about SARS-CoV-2 or the circumstances surrounding it. The medical issues that continue to take place in nursing homes and hospitals, more than a year later, do not represent a natural infection. The questions that should be asked today include: Were lab-engineered biological agents accidentally released or are they being deployed strategically as weapons? Are these weapons being used to depopulate the weakest, to carry out live vaccine experiments, or to simply cripple medical systems? New documents reveal that Chinese military scientists were discussing ways to aerosolize biological agents to cripple the enemy’s medical system. The sheer existence of coronavirus gain-of-function experiments should make any moral person demand a raid on these labs and demand an investigation into every person involved.
Why was there such a strong push early on to dismiss the lab leak theory?
In February of 2020, it was far too early to rule out the theory that covid-19 was a bioweapon, released accidentally or intentionally. However, Big Tech began censoring anything that questioned the official Chinese Communist Party narrative on covid-19. Why was there such a strong push to dismiss the lab leak theory, especially when years of research had gone into perfecting a coronavirus with enhanced gain-of-function properties that exploit human immune systems?
Gain-of-function coronavirus research was successfully funded for years through grants provided by Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. These grants were funneled to Dr. Peter Daszak at New York’s Eco Health Alliance. From there, the funds were paid out in multiple installments to Chinese researchers. In order for the research to continue, Chinese researchers had to report back to Daszak and Fauci. American universities worked with Dr. Shi Zheng-li, “the bat lady” of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The “bat lady” collected and isolated about one hundred different bat coronaviruses. She worked with Ralph S. Baric from the University of North Carolina to enhance the ability of bat viruses to attack human cells. Engineering coronaviruses was a well-funded endeavor because it allowed scientists to identify the best sequences to create new vaccines for human populations. This is just one potential use of this sinister, unethical research.
The race to exploit human immune systems is real and the coverup of bioweapon research is failing
The Chinese scientists ultimately found a way to engineer coronavirus spike proteins to exploit the ACE2 receptor in human lung cells. In June 2020, Chinese researchers published a new model for studying SARS-CoV-2, one that uses the CRISPR gene-editing tool to alter mice lung cells. The scientists equipped the mice with the ACE2 receptor from human lung cells. This is the same receptor that they learned how to exploit using their modified coronaviruses. These monsters had converted coronaviruses into easily deployable weapons that can be aerosolized to attack respiratory and cardiovascular systems.
If this doesn’t give enough clues to what is going on, then consider this: Upon further investigation, the virologists who originally published authoritatively in the Lancet did so on behalf of Dr. Peter Daszak himself, the man who funneled millions to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for this coronavirus gain-of-function research! If the SARS-CoV-2 virus had indeed escaped from research he funded or was deployed as a weapon around the world, then Dr. Daszak would be potentially guilty. Kristian G. Andersen of the Scripps Research Institute sided with Daszak in a second attempt to conceal the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon. But there isn’t just one way to create a chimeric coronavirus, as Dr. Andersen asserted in a failed attempt to block investigation.
There are at least three ways to conceal viral engineering. While there was no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was developed using viral genome cut-and-paste techniques, there is still the possibility that researchers used “serial passage” “no-see-um” or “seamless” approaches that leave no defining marks. Dr. Andersen was assuring the world of something that could not be confirmed, and Dr. Daszak was hiding behind a group of virologists to assert false, authoritative claims.
In order to get the spike protein to bind to the ACE2 receptor of human lung cells, virologists could have spliced in spike protein genes from other viruses using the serial passage technique. Every time a viral gene is transferred, the process of natural selection kicks in, bringing forth the most suitable gene that can bind to human cells. This gain-of-function process is concealed because the virologists can allow natural selection to do all the heavy lifting. It’s a man-made super virus, either way.
Deep down, Dr. Daszak understands all this, for he was quoted in an interview in 2019, praising the successful development of chimeric coronaviruses with spike proteins that can readily exploit humanized mice. “And we have now found, you know, after 6 or 7 years of doing this, over 100 new SARS-related coronaviruses, very close to SARS,” Dr. Daszak said. “Some of them get into human cells in the lab, some of them can cause SARS disease in humanized mice models and are untreatable with therapeutic monoclonals and you can’t vaccinate against them with a vaccine. So, these are a clear and present danger…”
This cold reality is also confirmed by the fact that SARS-CoV-2 was already genetically equipped to attack human lung cells from the start. During the 2003 epidemic of SARS, researchers were able to document changes in the spike protein as the virus faced natural selection. SARS-CoV-2, on the other hand, did not have to go through these evolutionary changes to become a dangerous pathogen.
“By the time SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in late 2019, it was already pre-adapted to human transmission to an extent similar to late epidemic SARS-CoV,” wrote Alina Chan of the Broad Institute. The first SARS spike protein went through six major changes before it could even become a mild pathogen in humans. After changing fourteen more times, it was more adapted to attach to human lung cells. It didn’t become an epidemic until it made another four adaptations. SARS-CoV-2, on the other hand, was most dangerous in the very beginning, until host adaptation weakened the virus.
There’s nothing natural about the circumstances leading up to covid-19, and nothing natural about the SARS-CoV-2 agent. The circumstances that brought the world to its knees wreak of criminal intent.
Lance D Johnson