One of the beauties of Divine Cancer Mathematics is that it works in both directions. If we add up all of the things that cause cancer and begin to eliminate them one by one we can reduce cancer rates by large amounts. Of course this is always easier said than done because in today’s world, contaminants are everywhere. Also people are unwilling to give up things that they enjoy or are addicted to, even knowing these things are harmful to their health.
The President’s Cancer Panel issued a landmark report suggesting that public health officials have “grossly underestimated” the extent of environmentally-induced cancer among the 1.5 million Americans diagnosed with the disease annually. A significant number of annual cancer deaths in the U.S. are caused by environmental pollutants and occupational exposures; lower-income workers and communities are disproportionately affected by these exposures (American Cancer Society, Facts and Figures, 2006). Oncologists and medical officials tend to make light of the threat from environmental hazards as do all people who live in big cities that are heavily polluted.
According to data published in the British Journal of Cancer in 2002, 4% of all breast cancers in the United Kingdom—about 44,000 cases a year—are due to alcohol consumption. While treating cancer this is a factor to be reckoned with. And surprisingly, marijuana actually helps prevent lung cancer—even smoking it. Yes, smoking marijuana damages lung cells, but these cells do not turn cancerous. The same cannot be said of smoking tobacco. Tobacco smokers who also smoke marijuana are at a slightly lower risk of getting lung cancer than tobacco-only smokers. Cannabinoids are extremely useful for treating cancer so in reality it turns out that smoking marijuana is much more life-serving and life-preserving then drinking.
The evidence that the various common types of cancer are largely avoidable diseases is not hard to find. By far the largest reliably known percentage is the 30% of current U.S. cancer deaths that are due to tobacco. As far back as 1981, the Journal of the National Cancer Institute was indicating that some nutritional factor(s) may eventually be found to be of comparable importance. Below we explore these nutritional factors.
Selenium is Basic to Cancer Treatment
Science knows that people who live in areas of selenium-rich or magnesium-rich soils are many times less likely to get cancer. In China, where the selenium levels in the soils vary much more dramatically than in the United States and the population is less mobile, an ecological study in 1985 showed dramatic results in linking cancer with selenium deficiencies. In the low-selenium classification, three times as many people died from cancer as in the high-selenium classification.
Cancer deaths for those taking the selenium were cut almost in half, according to the study that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on December 25, 1996. In addition, the people who had taken selenium had 63% fewer prostate cancers, 58% fewer colorectal cancers, 46% fewer lung cancers and overall 37% fewer cancers. Selenium was found to reduce the risk of lung cancer to a greater degree than stopping smoking.
Magnesium is Basic to Cancer Treatment
Several studies have shown an increased cancer rate in regions with low magnesium levels in soil and drinking water as well. In Egypt the cancer rate was only about 10% of that in Europe and America. In the rural fellah it was practically nonexistent. The main difference was an extremely high magnesium intake of 2.5-3 g in these cancer-free populations, ten times more than in most western countries.
An inverse relationship between cancer prevalence and the magnesium content of water and of soil was reported from early worldwide studies, starting more than 50 years ago. A Russian report showed that stomach cancer is four times more common in the Ukraine where the Mg content of soil and drinking water is low, than it is in Armenia where the Mg content is more than twice as high. A more recent morphologic and statistical analysis of neoplastic deaths in two Polish communities disclosed a nearly three-fold higher death rate in the community with Mg-poor soil than in the one with Mg-rich soil (10%).
Flooding the body with magnesium increases your chance of surviving your cancer and living a longer life by at least 20%, conservatively speaking; the true figure is probably much higher.
Vitamin D & the Sun
An epidemiological study by Dr. Cedric Garland focused on the relationship between breast cancer and vitamin D levels as shown in the medical literature. Their conclusion: If women kept their vitamin D blood levels at approximately 52 ng/ml, they could expect a 50% reduction in the risk of breast cancer.
Dr. Pamela Goodwin and colleagues retrospectively analyzed more than 500 women over a period of 11 years. Results: Women who had been deficient in vitamin D at the time of their breast cancer diagnosis were 73% more likely to die from breast cancer than those with sufficient vitamin D at the time of diagnosis, as well as being almost twice as likely to have recurrence over the 11-year period.
Dr. Joan Lappe and her colleagues looked prospectively at more than 400 postmenopausal women over a four-year period of time. Women in the study group were given 1100 IU of vitamin D and 1000 mg of calcium daily. The control group did not receive this. Results: Women who took the vitamin D and calcium reduced their rate of cancer by 60%. The authors found that for every 10 ng/ml increase in a woman’s vitamin D blood level, the relative risk of cancer dropped by 35%.
Another study by scientists from the International Agency for Research on Cancer in Lyon and the European Institute of Oncology in Milan reviewed 18 trials involving 57,000 people finding that those who took vitamin D supplements had a 7% lower risk of death overall during the six-year period of the study.
A clinical study in Russia conducted by Dr. Sergey Paschenko was published by the Ukrainian National Journal of Oncology. The elimination of hyperventilation and hypocapnia in patients with breast cancer through slower breathing led to an increase in the three-year survival rate and a better quality of life of patients. In this study when a modified breathing retraining technique was applied, the three-year mortality rate for the breathing normalization group was 4.5% and for the control group 24.5%. Hence, breathing normalization decreased 3-year mortality by more than 5 times. All patients who normalized their breathing survived. Let’s add another 30% chance of beating one’s cancer just from spending an hour a day using a Russian breathing device designed for asthmatics.
Bicarbonates & Super Nutrition
Bringing your body’s pH up to normal with the use of sodium and potassium bicarbonate along with dietary changes and the use of superfoods will increase your chances of surviving your cancer by a large amount considering that the cause of cancer is very much tied to low oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations, low cell voltage and low pH (meaning acidic) conditions.
Dr. Robert J. Gillies and team from Wayne State University School of Medicine shows that tumor invasion and peritumoral pH are, “In every case, the peritumoral pH was acidic and heterogeneous and the regions of highest tumor invasion corresponded to areas of lowest pH. In support of the functional importance of our findings, oral administration of sodium bicarbonate was sufficient to increase peritumoral pH and inhibit tumor growth and local invasion in a preclinical model, supporting the acid-mediated invasion hypothesis.”
It’s difficult to put a number on the effect of a strong pH shift to the alkaline or what super nutrition will do for a cancer patient besides saving them from dying of starvation after being eaten out of house and home by cancer cells.
If you look at this video about using toxic drugs to decrease the chance of contracting breast cancer by 50%, you will see that the methods described in Divine Cancer Mathematics are more rational by comparison. Using bicarbonates or drinking seawater itself (another great way to increase alkalinity) would probably decrease one’s chances of getting cancer by 50% and superfoods used would add their own powerful benefits.
Getting a moderate amount of plant substances called flavonoids through the diet is linked to a lower stomach cancer risk. Women with the highest intake of flavonoids were half as likely to develop cancer as were women who had the smallest intake. The Rejuvenate superfoods that I recommend are full of a long list of nutritional’s like flavonoids and many other cellular yummies that bring the cells back to harmony. One of the Rejuvenate products has spirulina and so many other nutritional yummies in a concentrated form that it’s impossible to count the positive effect.
A study published in the journal Carcinogenesis shows that in both cell lines and mouse models, grape seed extract (GSE) kills head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells, while leaving healthy cells unharmed. “It’s a rather dramatic effect,” says Rajesh Agarwal, PhD, investigator at the University of Colorado Cancer Center and professor at the Skaggs School of Pharmaceutical Sciences. This is just one example of a long line of food concentrates that cancers seem to hate. The study also shows that grape seed extract targets the cancer cells that become most resistant to chemotherapy.
Iodine & Full Hydration
Adding iodine to the point of saturating the thyroid, breasts, ovaries and prostate glands will easily increase your chances of defeating cancer (especially in these organs) by an unknown percent but I would wager it as a similar anti-cancer profile similar to selenium and magnesium. Iodine, administered in the way doctors used to prescribe 100 years ago, is a potent chemotherapy agent without any of the side effects of the common kind. Let’s assign 30% here.
Drinking enough pure, high-quality water would also make a large but incalculable difference. Imagine the difference between a person doing chemotherapy while fully hydrated and another who is suffering from severe dehydration. Doctors perhaps would scratch their heads on this one because they have no idea that the most basic medicine for cancer—or anything—is water. When treating cancer, only medicinal-quality water should be used, meaning no chlorine or fluoride. Let us assign a value of 20% difference at a minimum for the difference enough water makes in cancer treatment or prevention.
In Search of 100% Cure & Remission Rates
Who would not want a guarantee that they are going to survive their cancer? Most doctors and psychologists would probably agree that some people are beyond help and don’t even want to live (increasing numbers of people commit suicide) so no professional in his right mind would hope to attain a 100% cure rate.
Doctors would be more than happy with an 80% cancer cure rate and at that point probably would declare the war on cancer won. When we calculate the above anti-cancer rates we have easily arrived at 200% reductions of cancer rates or reduction at least from dying from the disease. That’s quite an insurance policy! Of course on a practical level we know the numbers will never be that high except when you count with Divine Mathematics. But can you think of any better way to add things up when it comes to cancer?
The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA, according to a US government site. As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival.
Chemotherapy, the massive poisoning of the already immune-suppressed human body is barbaric—even criminal malpractice—and the only reason one can glean from its use is the enormous profits made. The cost of the average chemotherapy regimen: $300,000 to $1,000,000. The end result is that chemo kills more patients than it “cures”.
Most of those deaths are the result of liver or heart failure. While chemo can shrink some tumors, the devastating cycotoxic nature of chemo “therapy” further destroys the patient’s already compromised and failing immune system causing an even quicker demise.
We have to add in glutathione and cannabinoid medicine into our calculations for these are substances that also bring about cancer healing. There are many success stories documenting the use of hemp oil alone for cancer and I am sure Rick Simpson would easily support the notion that this medicine alone would singlehandedly cure 50% of people who used a high enough dosage of it. But who wants to argue about numbers?
If we add only another 20% for cannabinoids, which can be administered in many ways, and only 10% for glutathione, which can be administered intravenously, sublingually, nebulized and through enemas, we are increasing our sense of certainty that the war on cancer can be won. Above is a list of anti-cancer agents of the most powerful kind, but there are many other cancer solutions that can continue to increase cancer patients’ chances of survival.
The idea is to maximize people’s chances of surviving their cancer or avoiding it altogether by using this type of cancer mathematics. Putting all the substances together creates a new form of oncology—a natural oncology—or what might be called natural chemotherapy. The only alternative is to turn to tests and treatments that increase one’s chances of getting cancer. Surgery, biopsies, CAT scans, X-rays, mammograms, chemotherapy and radiation all increase one’s chances of getting or dying from cancer.
Dr. Mark Sircus
- The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today; Doll R, Peto R.; J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Jun;66(6):1191-308.
- MAY 19, 1931, Dr. P. Schrumpf-Pierron presented a paper entitled “On the Cause Of the Rarity of Cancer in Egypt,” which was printed in the Bulletin of the Academy of Medicine, and the Bulletin of the French Association for the Study of Cancer in July, 1931.
- Experience in the techniques of breath in the complex treatment of breast cancer patients, Kiev, 2001, v. 3, No.1, p. 77-78.
- Acidity generated by the tumor microenvironment drives local Invasion; Veronica Estrella, Tingan Chen, Mark Lloyd, et al; Cancer Res Published OnlineFirst January 3, 2013; doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2796
- First published October 17, 2012, doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.037358 Am J Clin Nutr December 2012 ajcn.037358 http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/early/2012/10/17/ajcn.112.037358
- S. Shrotriya, G. Deep, M. Gu, M. Kaur, A. K. Jain, S. Inturi, R. Agarwal, C. Agarwal. Generation of reactive oxygen species by grape seed extract causes irreparable DNA damage leading to G2/M arrest and apoptosis selectively in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis, 2012; DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs019