Prof. Enderlein called the very basic particle, ground form of all other developments, “Endobiont”, deriving from the Greek word endobios (endo = inside, bios = live). The word endobios is clearly defined by Thesaurus as “live of organisms within a medium or an organ of animals and human beings, e.g. in the intestines”. These relationships can be symbiotic (endosymbiosis) or damaging (endoparasitism).
Enderlein’s definition of the “Endobiont”: Proteinaceous particle of plant origin, found in all mammals, including human beings. This particle has intra and extra cellular regulatory effects. Unhealthy changes of the environment (biological terrain) can lead to pathological developments of the endobiont bringing about disease. His conclusion that this proteinaceous particle is of plant origin stems from his experiment of culturing erythrocytes with these particles in it that developed into a strain of mucor racemosus.
A protein, as per definition, is a chain of about 200 amino acids, which is molecule size and impossible to see with a dark field microscope or even with an electron scanning microscope. Only conglomerates of millions of these proteinaceous particles can be seen in dark field. Prof. Enderlein called them “Protits”, “Symprotits” and “Macrosymprotits”. Their erratic movements observed in dark field is due to Brownian motions, which is a term used in Physics to describe the bouncing of molecules of each other. “Protits”, “Symprotits” (see picture) and “Macrosymprotits” are often mistaken for chylomicrons (tiny fat droplets from food uptake) by dark field microscopists. It is therefore best to take a fasting blood sample for dark field microscopy.
Enderlein’s “Endobiont” only had meanings to dark field microscopists following his teaching and was frowned upon by conventional medical science.
“There are hints that the prions causing the diseases explored thus far may not be the only ones”.
Watch Live Blood Analysis Dark Field Microscopy explained by Dr. Seeger
So, what has this all got to do with Enderlein’s “Endobiont”?
To answer this question take a look at Prof. Prusiner’s definition of a “Prion”: “Small proteinaceous infectious particle, which resists inactivation by procedures that modify nucleic acids.” Unlike known infectious agents, prions contain no genetic material and are simply proteins. Furthermore, the gene encoding for prions is found in all mammals, including humans. Prusiner’s work found that, under normal conditions, prions are innocuous, but they have an innate ability to convert into harmful structures.
You do not have to be Einstein to figure out that Prusiner’s “Prion” and Enderlein’s “Endobiont” describe the same proteinaceous particle. If it wasn’t for the scare of “mad cow’s disease” and infection of humans by it, conventional scientists would still laugh at Prusiner’s discovery of “Prions” as they have done for decades earlier. The Nobel citation from Sweden’s Karolinska Institute said: “Prusiner has added prions to the list of well-known infectious agents, including bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites”. If the outbreak of “mad cow’s disease” would have happened 60 years earlier, Enderlein’s “Endobiont” might have been the recognized terminology for it. Who knows?
Enderlein identified what he called “unhealthy changes of the environment” as culprit of pathological developments of the endobiont. We now know these changes are mainly due to disturbance of the acid-base balance in extra cellular fluids. A “rotten apple effect” is also blamed, which means, one structurally changed disease forming proteinaceous particle can infect others.
Enderlein’s research found that adding normal stage protits to pathologically developed stages helped to reduce these forms back to benign ones. He created what he called “isopathic remedies”, which he made from endobiontic forms of different strains of fungi.
Latest research by Prusiner’s institute and other researchers around the world indicates Diabetes Type II, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and Motor Neuron disease to be prion related diseases (1, 2, 3). Enderlein’s “isopathic remedies” could therefore be the ideal medication to treat those diseases. Problem is, there is no guarantee that these remedies do not contain rogue prions or endobionts that have this “rotten apple effect” and accelerate the disease in the first place.
The remedies of concern are these days marketed under the name of “Sanum Therapy”. General academic perception of these remedies are summed up.
by Dr. Hilbert Seeger
- Live Blood Microscopy Analysis Darkfield Course
- Mad cow disease research breakthrough: scientists recreate prions in the lab
- A Modern Scientific Perspective On Prof. Dr. Enderlein’s Concept Of Microbial Life Cycles
- Professor Enderlein’s research: developing isopathic immune-modulators from bacteria and fungi